News RSS Feed



click here for Your Neighbourhood

Crystal Palace Park planning inquiry begins into London Development Agency scheme


A month-long planning inquiry into the future of Crystal Palace Park has begun with campaigners calling for “over ambitious” plans to be thrown out.

The London Development Agency’s (LDA) £67m plans for the historic park saw protesters gather in Upper Norwood on Tuesday.

The scheme was approved by Bromley Council last year and despite support from the London Mayor Boris Johnson, the planning application was called in by the Secretary of State.

Speaking at the inquiry at the Salvation Army Hall, in Westow Street, Robert McCracken, representing the Crystal Palace Community Association, said: “The plan would cause serious harm and the application is inappropriate for a sensitive area such as this.”

He added: “It represents old fashioned thinking.”

English Heritage argued the scheme offered public benefits.

Representing the organisation, Mike Harlow said: “The regeneration of the park is long overdue and these proposals are very welcome.”

But Mr Harlow told the inquiry the housing plans were “not perfect”.

The plans would see 180 flats built on 2.5 acres of metropolitan open land to fund much of the refurbishment.

But Mr McCracken said: “There is no evidence that residential development would make the plans viable.”

He also argued the Caravan Club’s lengthy lease would mean residential houses would not be possible.

“The effects on the wildlife would be substantial and there would be substantial harm for the bats,” he added.

The LDA claims its plans, which include a museum, greenhouses on the Italian and a treetop walk were “ambitious and sensitive”.

In his opening statement Richard Ground, representing the LDA, said: “The proposals would manifestly improve and enhance Crystal Palace Park.

“The park is genuinely of national interest and importance.

“The Secretary of State should grant planning permission so the park can reestablish itself as one of the great parks of London.”

The Government inspector Alan Novitzky is expected to make a visit to the park on Friday.

• What do you think? Let us know by email here, phone the newsdesk on 020 8330 9555 or leave a comment below.


Your Say YourStreatham

lord norwood, north croydon says...
9:57pm Tue 7 Jul 09

The problem is not so much with the plans, but with so many disparate groups in the area wanting thier say. There is an organisation called the Crystal Palace community Assoc who's remit is to look after the conservation area , jump on any dodgy planning applications etc. But with them jumping on this park band wagon all sorts of things are happening , such as a lovely old traditinal shopfront being ripped out at an indian restaurant and replaced with a steel monstrosity. Leave the big stuff to the experts, small fish do not jump into large ponds.

Steve Sawko, Crystal Palace says...
10:53pm Tue 7 Jul 09

It is important to understand that the estimated cost of this "over ambitious" project is, in fact, £100M, not the £67M the LDA is touting. This fact was successfully argued by one of Bromley’s Councillors at the meeting last year when they approved the proposal - the LDA did not even try to defend their reported £67M but simply acknowledged the true £100M+ figure. Unfortunately, despite this debate consuming a significant proportion of the meeting, Bromley failed to minute this exchange or, indeed, acknowledge the fact in their Press Release the next day. BTW, £100M is exactly 50% bigger than £67M !

jillyb59, Beckenham says...
11:29am Thu 16 Jul 09

English Heritage, in their opening statements said that the building of houses would not be approved if they were being built to fund the scheme, but that as the £8m would hardly dent the £67/100m, this was not an issue. Interestingly, Bromley Council said this WAS why they were being built, and CPCA simply agreed that the profits would not touch the sides of the £67/£100m. So why are they being built? Why are the plans for the park so ambitious? The park is used by people who want green open spaces - go on a saturday and sunday and see crowds using it as a Park - a green open space, not a leisure facility. This is so frustrating - why spend so much money to fix something that is not broken?

Comments are closed on this article.

Protest: Campaigners against housing on Crystal Palace Park Protest: Campaigners against housing on Crystal Palace Park

Local Links

Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »