'Vilified' Christians 'fear arrest'

Lord Carey said Christians were excluded from many sectors of employment because of their beliefs Lord Carey said Christians were excluded from many sectors of employment because of their beliefs

Christians are being "persecuted" and "driven underground" while the courts fail to protect their religious values, a former Archbishop of Canterbury has claimed.

Lord Carey said Christians were excluded from many sectors of employment because of their beliefs, "vilified by state bodies" and feared arrest for expressing their views.

The former archbishop's claims are part of a written submission to the European Court of Human Rights, seen by the Daily Telegraph, ahead of a landmark case on religious freedom.

The hearing will deal with the case of two workers forced out of their jobs after visibly wearing crosses, the case of a Relate therapist sacked for saying he may not be comfortable giving sex counselling to homosexual couples, and a Christian registrar who wishes not to conduct civil partnership ceremonies.

In the submission, Lord Carey said the outward expression of traditional conservative Christian values has effectively been "banned" under a new "secular conformity of belief and conduct".

The former archbishop argued that in "case after case" British courts have failed to protect Christian values and urged European judges to correct the balance. He said there was a "drive to remove Judeo-Christian values from the public square" and argued UK courts have "consistently applied equality law to discriminate against Christians" as they show a "crude" misunderstanding of the faith by treating some worshippers as "bigots".

In his submission, Lord Carey, who was archbishop from 1991 to 2002, wrote: "In a country where Christians can be sacked for manifesting their faith, are vilified by state bodies, are in fear of reprisal or even arrest for expressing their views on sexual ethics, something is very wrong. It affects the moral and ethical compass of the United Kingdom. Christians are excluded from many sectors of employment simply because of their beliefs; beliefs which are not contrary to the public good."

He added: "It is now Christians who are persecuted; often sought out and framed by homosexual activists. Christians are driven underground. There appears to be a clear animus to the Christian faith and to Judaeo-Christian values. Clearly the courts of the United Kingdom need guidance."

He argued British judges have used a strict reading of the equality law to strip the legal right to freedom of religion of "any substantive effect."

Keith Porteous-Wood, executive director of the National Secular Society, told the Telegraph: "The idea that there is any kind of suppression of religion in Britain is ridiculous. Even in the European Court of Human Rights, the right to religious freedom is not absolute - it is not a licence to trample on the rights of others. That seems to be what Lord Carey wants to do."

Comments(7)

Albion. says...
6:37am Sat 14 Apr 12

"The hearing will deal with the case of two workers forced out of their jobs after visibly wearing crosses, the case of a Relate therapist sacked for saying he may not be comfortable giving sex counselling to homosexual couples, and a Christian registrar who wishes not to conduct civil partnership ceremonies."
If they can't/won't do their job there is no alternative but to sack them, imagine if I went to a supermarket and the assistant refused to check out my wine and bacon because they were Muslim! Anyone who wishes to wear a cross should be allowed to do so as long as they fulfil their job description.

uncatom says...
9:11am Sat 14 Apr 12

Well Albion there lies the difference muslims have complained about smells from a cafe (bacon frying) they are allowed to roll around on the ground during working hours they are allowed to wear various styles of garb required (allegedely)for their religion so whats the difference? oh and to deny homosexuals

John Steed says...
9:22am Sat 14 Apr 12

we are a christian country with her majesty head of the c of e the defender of the faith etc.
we happily support the rights of anybody to follow their own faiths including those that are classed by some as sects. we permit those who kinfolk are killing our military in their country to live and worship in our country in peace.
As we would take no action against any non christian wearing religious articles in public or at work, it is high time that laws we have to protect and cherish the rights of others should equaly apply to the indigenous population in cluding those who follow our official religion and its offshoots.
I fully support the cases refered to above, it is not a case of if I believe they are right or wrong in their veiw points, its a case of I believe in democracy, freedom of thought and speech, no job description should overide or deprive anyone of their faith or indeed their choice not to follow one

Joedavid says...
9:23am Sat 14 Apr 12

If you go to the supermarket and the checkout opperator is wearing some religious symbol or clothing you can choose to be served by them or another opporator.
They do not get sacked but it seems Christians do.

s6blr says...
9:51am Sat 14 Apr 12

1) Go onto you tube
2) Put in the search box "
THE BEGINNING OF THE END FOR BRITAIN"
3) See what has happened to our fair shores for yourself.

Welcome to Britganistan.

In Absentia says...
11:40am Sat 14 Apr 12

Sorry, but a belief or faith in something completely intangible like a deity, should not give anyone the right to then say that they will refuse access to public services to others.

For example, if a Registrar wishes to refuse to provide a service that their job is required to do by law, then they'll have to go and do something else, surely? People who get married in Register Offices are not allowed to have any religious content in their ceremonies by law, so why should Registrars be allowed to use personal religious beliefs to discriminate against certain parts of the law they don't agree with? Surely, Registrars work in a secular service?

Dr Carey is getting rather hysterical.

uncatom says...
2:19pm Sat 14 Apr 12

In Absentia,I am not a religious person,but surely all religions should be able to practice or participate in their religious beliefs on an equal footing unlike the system we have now were christians cant do certain things for fear of upsetting muslims but the opposite does'nt apply to the oft quoted infidel.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree